Frederick William Randolph

Lance Corporal* Frederick William Randolph, Regimental Number 27745,
of the 14th (Service) Battalion Royal Hampshire Regiment, died of wounds on 29th September, 1917.

*In many of his records, including his hospital admission at death, he is listed as ‘Private’. His headstone, his entry in Soldiers Died in the Great War, 1914-1919 (HMSO) and the newspaper article (below) record his rank as Lance Corporal. A promotion (probably to an ‘Acting’ or ‘Temporary’ rank, which didn’t carry an increased pay grade) shortly before his death is assumed.


Serendipity

From its inception the Winchester Training College Fallen project focused on recording the life stories of the sixty men who were named on the memorial panelling in the college chapel. When these stories had been written and the work almost complete, a chance discovery unearthed a sixty-first former student, who may have been missed in 1922 when the names were carved in the ‘oak panelling placed round the walls as a memorial to the students who fell in the Great War.’(Rose, p.69)

The college chapel: the oak panelling, which carries the carved names of the fallen on its top frieze, is visible on the left-hand lower wall.

Tracing the life stories of the sixty involved extensive exploration of many archives and collections. These searches tended to be based on the name of the student being researched, or his family members, places of residence or teaching, or specific subjects related to the unfolding narrative. As a mopping-up operation at the end of the project, it was decided that a more general search of the British Newspaper Archive was needed, targeting all college activity. This was undertaken in the hope of picking up oblique references to any of our men, or articles where the student’s name is present but had not been among the data returned by previous searches due to poor Optical Character Recognition (OCR) in the digital archiving process. This is a particular problem with newspaper archives as the quality of closely-set newsprint is often low. Such a trawl had been considered in the early phase of the project, but its extent was somewhat daunting: searching for “Winchester Training College” for the period covered by the fallen, returned around five hundred articles. The search was therefore deferred until the bulk of the work was done and time became available.

The results were useful: 38 articles were found that augmented or verified the stories of the sixty. There was one item, however, that stood out. It suggested a sixty-first casualty of the Great War—one whose name was not found of the memorial rail in the chapel. The short article was carried in the Wiltshire Times and Trowbridge Advertiser of Saturday, 27 October 1917, page 12:

The start of Frederick’s story—a chance discovery. Transcript below.

TISBURY

TOLL OF THE WAR.—Police Sergt. Randolph has received official information of the death of his only son, Lce.-Corpl. and Company Clerk, Frederick William Randolph, Hants, at a casualty clearing hospital in France, on September 29th, from wounds received in action. He was only 19 years of age, and was a most promising young fellow. Having first gained a scholarship at Downton School he passed on to the Bishop’s School, where he gained honours in the Oxford Seniors, became a student teacher at Tisbury Church of England School, and from this school entered Winchester Training College, joining the College Battalion as soon as he reached military age. Much sympathy is felt for Mr. and Mrs. Randolph, who have received a letter from the Sister-in-charge of the clearing hospital, expressing her sorrow, and informing them their son was buried in the cemetery at Godewaewvlde. [sic]

This, then, is the story of Frederick William Randolph—perhaps our sixty-first man of the Winchester Training College Fallen.

The Wiltshire Randolphs

Frederick’s forebears were Wiltshire people through and through. His great-grandparents (seven of the eight have been traced ) were born in the late 1700s or early 1800s in the small villages just to the east of Trowbridge: Steeple Ashton, West Ashton, Keevil, and Great Hinton. All the men were recorded as Agricultural Labourers or Agricultural Servants. ‘The usual distinction between a farm servant and a farm labourer was that a servant was an adolescent boy or an unmarried man who was hired for a year and who lived on the farm, whereas an agricultural labourer was usually a married man who lived elsewhere (often in a tied cottage) and who was paid a daily or weekly wage for the job that he performed.’ (Hey). This distinction, while generally found in these Wiltshire records, is not strictly maintained: his father Fed Randolph is ‘Labourer’ (1881) but ‘Servant’ (1891).

The same localities and occupations are found in subsequent generations: grandfathers James Randolph (b.1842, West Ashton) and Thomas Sturges Pearce (b.1834, Keevil) were both Farm Labourers. His grandmothers were also from rural labourer’s families in the same area: Esther Randolph (née Newman, b.1844, Steeple Ashton) and Priscilla Pearce (née Overton, b.1847, Atworth). Esther’s background was from the same social stratum: her father was described as a gamekeeper just before his early death, in the 1841 Census, and Priscilla’s father was an agricultural labourer.

The trend both continued and ended with his father, Fred Randolph (b.1868, West Ashton). At the age of 22 (April 1891) he was working as an agricultural servant but within 18 months, his occupation had changed and was recorded as a Police Constable. (Marriage Register entry, November 12th 1892.) His age in the register is incorrectly stated as 26. There is an inconsistency in the record of his age throughout the census and other records. His date of birth recorded on the 1939 England and Wales Register (22 August 1868) is the most reliable as the Register was the basis for Second World War identity cards and is usually taken as being definitive. Ages in the narrative are calculated from this Register date.

Steeple Ashton. Date and copyright unknown.

At the age of 24 he married twenty-one-year-old Louisa Jane Pearce on 12th November 1892 in the Parish Church of St Mary the Virgin, Steeple Ashton. A little over one year later Dulcie Viola was born (9th December 1893), followed by Dorothy Louisa on 27th August 1896, Frederick William on 29th December 1897 and Gwendoline Felicia on 6th November 1907. Both Fred and Louisa were from large families; the children would have at least twenty-eight aunts and uncles: Fred had six sisters and two brothers; Louisa had four sisters and four brothers. There is a possibility that some of their marriages have not been traced.

Shortly before their marriage, Fred had moved out of the family home and had become a Police Constable in the ancient Saxon town of Malmesbury, north Wiltshire. It was here that he and Louisa were to make their home, one of three families living in tied Police houses which formed part of the town’s Police Station in Gastons Lane, in an area known then as Westport St. Mary, a quarter of a mile from the town centre. He worked under Superintendent Alfred Webb, twenty years his senior, and Sergeant Alexander Mackie, a Scot and three years his senior.

Dulcie, Dorothy and Frederick were born in Malmesbury. Gwendoline was born in Longbridge Deverill, Wiltshire, thirty miles to the south. Fred had been posted to this Wiltshire hamlet sometime between April 1901 and May 1902. These date limits are defined by two sources: the 1901 Census, and Fred’s acting as a police witness in a trial in Trowbridge Police Court in May 1902. It is here that we read a typical appearance of Fred in print:

PETTY SESSIONS, Thursday Before the Marquis of Bath (chairman), Mr. W.F. Morgan, and Col. Alexander

BAD LANGUAGE—Walter Whatley, labourer, of Longbridge Deverill, and John Carpenter, labourer, of Cockerton, were charged with using bad language at Longbridge Deverill on August 28th.—P.C. Randolph stated the facts and defendants were each fined 2s. 6d.

Warminster & Westbury journal, and Wilts County Advertiser, Saturday 10 May 1902, p.8

Other news items carry his witness statements in trials concerning: the theft of a broom head, driving a cart at night without lights, threats from a farmer, a publican allowing drunkenness on his premises, sleeping under a hayrick with no visible means of subsistence, and drunkenness. Such was the lot of a village bobby in a sleepy hamlet—although we need to note that his work included some duties in the busting town of Warminster, which had a population similar to today’s: 17,490 in 1901 (Census).

The older girls were showing an aptitude for handwork. In the nearby Warminster Cottagers’ Garden Society 49th Annual Show, Dulcie and Dorothy both won 2nd prize in Knitting and Crochet work, Dorothy a 2nd in Patchwork and a 1st in Plain Work. It was also recorded that the exhibition marquee collapsed during the show due to high winds. (Wiltshire Times and Trowbridge Advertiser, Saturday 20 August 1904, p.5)

A village policeman, 1912. Copyright Elsworth Chronicle

By 1910, the family had moved once again. This time Fred had been promoted to Police Sergeant and his new territory was Downton, Wiltshire—twenty-two miles away, five miles south of the city of Salisbury. The family were living once again in the police station, which was situated on The Borough (see image, below)—the main street running through the part of the village on the west bank of the River Avon. It is here that we catch up with news of Frederick, and our focus now moves on to him.

The Borough, Downton. Copyright unknown

School Days

Although Frederick must have begun his education in Longbridge Deverill, no record has been found of this. His schooling after the move to Downton is recorded in the Bursary Log of his secondary school: The Bishop’s School, Salisbury (from 1911 the school was renamed Bishop Wordsworth’s School on the death of its founder).

Frederick’s primary school was Downton County School, only a few yards from his family home. His sister Dulcie had clearly applied herself in her studies and the 1911 Census tells us that she was a ‘School Teacher (Elementary)’ at the age of seventeen. It is likely that she was a pupil teacher, a role that she would have begun at the age of fifteen. She would probably have worked in the girls’ or infants’ school and had little contact with Frederick during his time in the boys’ school. Dulcie would eventually marry Alfred Ernest Barnes, a farm labourer from Bere Regis, Dorset, in 1923 (d.1972, Bere Regis). They settled in Wareham, Dorset and had one son, Randolph Barnes (b.1925 in Wareham, d.2005 Poole, Dorset). Dulcie’s occupation is recorded as ‘Unpaid Domestic Duties’ in the 1939 England and Wales Register. She died in 1968 in Bere Regis.

The school had been built in 1895 and was planned to accommodate 170 boys, 80 girls and 88 infants and in 1907 the average attendance was 120 boys, 54 girls & 48 infants. Frederick would have studied under the headship of John Northover, and assistant master John William Ford (Kelly’s 1907, p.241). Evidently, he excelled in his studies, and left the school in the summer of 1910 with a Wiltshire County Council bursary to attend Bishop Wordsworth’s School, Salisbury as a Day Scholar.

Bishop Wordsworth’s School. Public Domain. Original image by Ronald Thornton, derivative work by John Vickers

On Monday, 12th September, 1910, Frederick would have started out from home on the six-mile journey to his new school. Although the school was in the shadow of the cathedral, it was not one of the old-foundation grammar schools. A quick thumbnail history will give a taste of Frederick’s new surroundings:

The Bishop of Salisbury, John Wordsworth… set up ‘The Bishop’s School’ in a room in the Bishop’s Palace on 13th January 1890 – it was attended by just 45 boys. … Bishop Wordsworth personally donated £3000, which was used to purchase a portion of land in the Cathedral Close and build the original school buildings. … In July 1892 the school adopted its first Science Specialism… the Chemistry Lab was equipped that year too. The following year saw the erection of the Carpenter’s Shop… A new building including a Physics Lab and Lecture Room was added in 1897, swiftly followed by a Smith’s Forge and Workshop in 1900. … In 1902 the school became a Grammar School, consisting of the current Chapel Block, and Bishopgate. The number attended [sic] rose quickly from the initial 45 to about 90 in the Autumn of 1890, to 150 by 1900 and to over 600 by 1922. (Bishop Wordsworth’s School website)

Frederick’s diligence in his studies is evident in his examination successes: in 1915, at the age of seventeen, he passed his Oxford Senior Local Examinations with honours and a distinction in French (BWS Records). Other than this, we do not know which subjects this award covers: it was possible to gain the certificate by passing in five subjects, but eleven were covered by the curriculum: Arithmetic, English, Mathematics (Algebra, Geometry and Trigonometry), Higher Geometry, Latin, Greek, English History, Geography, French or German, Chemistry or Physics, and a portion of New Testament in Greek (Ackland, p.34). It is likely that his diligence, intelligence and excellent grasp of French would later make him an ideal Company Clerk—as mentioned in his local press death announcement—looking after the paperwork of the 250 or so men in one of the Battalion’s four Companies.

On leaving Bishop Wordsworth’s on 31st July, 1915, Frederick shows that he had decided on his future career: teaching. He secured a position as a student teacher at Tisbury Church of England School. A student teacher’s post could be taken for a maximum of one year before going on to full-time teacher training at a recognised college. Frederick would begin his teaching career in the 290-pupil mixed school under the tutelage of the headmaster, John Freestone (Kelly’s, 1915), leaving on 31st July 1916 after having completed his year there. We note that in late 1916, Frederick’s next of kin was listed by the Army as his father, whose address was given as The Bennett Arms, Semley, Wilts, just three and a half miles southwest of Tisbury. It is not known when the family moved there nor if this overlapped with Frederick’s teaching at Tisbury. Unlikely as it may seem, Police Sergeant Fred was living in a public house while still working as a policeman. It is difficult to know whether this may have been a potentially compromising situation, or one of convenience: being on hand to deal with drunken behaviour. He was still being reported in the press as a policeman in 1920 (e.g. Wiltshire Times and Trowbridge Advertiser, Saturday 16 October 1920, p.7). An obituary of his wife, Louisa, in 1925 (Wiltshire Times and Trowbridge Advertiser, Saturday 14 March 1925, p.3. Her death was March 3rd.) shows they were still living at the Bennett Arms at that point and that Fred was an ‘Ex-P.S.’. Fred’s 1939 England and Wales Register entry lists him as a ‘Retired Police Sergeant’ and living in Trowbridge with his unmarried daughter Gwendoline.

Tisbury. Copyright Tisbury History Society. Used by permission

Frederick Doesn’t Go to War

We must return at this point to the newspaper article which began this story, and the statement: ‘from this school he entered Winchester Training College’. This looks straightforward, but the detail is somewhat less so. To explore this, we must take a lengthy detour through the effects that the war was having on Frederick’s situation, with particular reference to changes in recruitment policy in the world of teacher training.

Frederick was under-age until the end of 1915, by which time he had begun his work as a student teacher at Tisbury. Although teachers were in a reserved occupation and exempt from war service, those training or about to begin training for the profession were not. But much had changed in the call-up process during this school year.

The Army needed around 92,000 recruits per month to replace losses. Towards the end of 1915 recruitment was running at around half this number. 1.5 million men were in reserved occupations and almost forty percent of volunteers were rejected for medical reasons. Enlisting in the Army had, until the end of 1915 been voluntary, although the Group System (also known as the Derby Scheme) in late 1915 was effectively a halfway house towards conscription. It is best described as being voluntary but coercive. It gave men a delayed and predictable entry into service rather than abrupt conscription, which many thought would very shortly be introduced. Derby Scheme men were placed on a reserve list and given an assurance that they would not be called up before a given future date. They were also given a day’s pay and an armband to wear in public to obviate accusations of cowardice or shirking. Even so, the scheme failed to elicit the numbers required. The Derby Scheme was closed about two weeks before Frederick’s eighteenth birthday when he reached military age. Officially, this precluded him from enlisting under the scheme although many of a similar age did so under-age by falsifying their dates of birth.

Within days of Frederick’s eighteenth birthday, Prime Minister Asquith introduced the Military Service Bill in Parliament to address the shortfall by introducing conscription. The Bill was Passed and given Royal Assent on 27th January 1916, coming into force on 2nd March 1916.

So, we have two possibilities: Frederick could have enlisted under-age through the Derby scheme. If he did not, he would be subject to conscription when it commenced in the Spring of 1916. Which route he took is somewhat academic for the short term: the Government had given the public an undertaking that young men would not be called until they turned 19. As we shall later see, he seems to have been called up on or around 10th November 1916, six weeks before his 19th birthday. The Army must have believed at this point that he was nineteen years old.

At some point, therefore, Frederick must have given a falsified date of birth. It is difficult to understand why he would ignore the opportunity to register under the Derby Scheme by posing as older, then wait until conscription before falsifying his date of birth by a few weeks. The circumstances would therefore suggest the Derby Scheme route as more likely, giving recruiters his date of birth as being on or before 10th November 1897. This also sits more easily with the newspaper’s ‘joining…as soon as he reached military age’—a difficult public statement to make in a local newspaper had he been conscripted when almost a year older than minimum age.

The Government amnesty for 18-year-olds left Frederick free to complete his year as a student teacher at Tisbury and begin teacher training—by this time the Anglican colleges took the view that students, even if their studies were to be interrupted by wartime service, could complete their course after the war.

The newspaper article reports one further detail: ‘joining the College Battalion…’. This also is problematic. Winchester Training College students, with very few exceptions, joined a territorial unit at the beginning of their course—‘B’ Company of the 4th Territorial Battalion of the Hampshire Regiment. So, one would expect the 4th Battalion, Hampshire Regiment to be Frederick’s unit. However, 4th Hants had left England for India, landing there in October 1914, serving out the war in Mesopotamia, India and Russia. We know from Army documents that Frederick enlisted in Salisbury into the 14th (Service) Battalion of the Hampshire Regiment. The article’s ‘College Battalion’ comment is probably a reference to the Regiment—the Hampshire Regiment—rather than Battalion.

As the summer of 1916 and the end of his student teacher’s post approached, entry into training was open to Frederick, and becoming a student of Winchester Training College was his choice. We are not, however, done with the complexities of an England in wartime turmoil.

Winchester Becomes Battersea

The Anglican teacher training colleges had done more than their fair share of providing men for the war. In 1914 alone, the vast majority of its male students had volunteered for service, leading Osborne to remark of Saltley College in Birmingham, ‘almost the whole college marched out of the main gate in August 1914.’ This is not hyperbole, as can be seen in the statistics from all training colleges (local authority and voluntary), listing the eight institutions—seven of which are Anglican—with the highest proportion of students serving in 1914 (Boyd):

CollegeIn Training 1914Enlisted 1914%
Battersea15014093.3
Winchester807492.5
Bede (Durham)1019392.1
Sunderland*696289.9
Culham (Oxon)928188.0
Exeter11710287.2
Saltley (B’ham)1109384.5
Chelsea13610577.2
*local authority, not C of E

In August 1914, Winchester was the first college to close its doors for the duration of the war and it did so voluntarily at the very outset of the war. Almost all its students were now serving in the military, having been on Territorial Summer Camp on Salisbury Plain when war was declared. They were immediately mobilised. It must have been a strange experience for them as they were almost immediately billeted by the Army in the very buildings in which they had been studying. The remaining students (some of whom later enlisted, others were medically exempt) continued their studies under an arrangement with Bede College, Durham. Bede had a parallel experience to Winchester. In the summer of 1914, most of their students had been on territorial summer camp and were immediately mobilised, being drafted into the Durham Light Infantry. The Board of Education, acting with the National Society, designated Bede as a gathering point for other colleges’ displaced students, it remained open for a further two years, closing at the end of term in July 1916. None of the memorial roll men studied at Bede. The fresh 1914 intake of twenty-four new students about to start their studies at Winchester, were transferred to Exeter Diocesan College. Among these students were two men on the memorial roll: William Richard Parsons and Charles Frank Singleton. Exeter college remained open for 1914–1915 academic year before closing in July 1915. The Winchester students who had begun their course in 1914 were then transferred to Bede College for their second (final) year where they studied alongside Bede men, a small contingent from Culham College, Oxford, and refugees from the Peterborough college (St. Peter’s Training College). All remained as Winchester Training College students and had contact throughout their time in Durham as, ’Two Tutors from Winchester, Mr Davis [music and drawing] and Mr Turley, came to Bede under the Scheme, to fill vacant places on the staff, and not only gave valuable assistance in the work of the College, but identified themselves with its life and interests in a way which deserves much praise.’ (Bede College Durham 75th Annual Report, p.6). It is possible that H. W. Padwick (Tutor in teaching method) also joined the staff at Durham.

Other colleges met a similar fate: closure and dispersal of students to remaining colleges. The process, called Concentration, was overseen by the National Society (now known as The Church of England Education Office) in partnership with the Board of Education. Winchester had been at the forefront of this policy: ‘Winchester, with its Principal in Burford Camp, asked not to receive other students [i.e. not to become a point of concentration as Exeter, Durham, York, etc.] but to be temporarily closed, if its financial security could be guaranteed.’ (National Society, Winchester Correspondence: letter from E. G. Wainwright, 26.8.1914 quoted in Boyd).1 The closure of a college was not compulsory, though any college remaining open would have to accept responsibility for its own finances and would not receive any compensation for losses incurred due to low student numbers. Effectively it was financially impossible to stay open and, in order to keep solvent and have any post-war future, colleges decided to close. Eventually, by the start of the 1916–1917 academic year, a further iteration of the concentration scheme left St. John’s College Battersea as the sole open institution (the Battersea college eventually became, via a convoluted route, Plymouth Marjon University). It was here that all continuing and new students would be concentrated.

The students remained, as previously mentioned, members of their own mothballed colleges. However, we need to note a contradictory entry in a Winchester Training College Committee meeting held at Wolvesey Church House on October 29th 1916. The Minute book of the Committee of the Training College, 1909-1927 addressed the situation in the Autumn of 1916 and although the academic year at Battersea had already begun, we read, ‘only Battersea would be open for the year 1916–17, and that all students admitted this autumn would be considered as members of Battersea College, and all Grants would be paid to that College.’ If this were true, Frederick would not be a Winchester Training College student. However, the statement is plainly contradicted by the Battersea record which considers these men as a separate entity and names them as ’Winchester students’ (see below). There is also conflicting information within the Winchester record: the Minute Book goes on to report a further Committee meeting held on February 1st 1918, where it is stated, ‘in the past year [meaning the same 1916-17 academic year referred to in the earlier quote] only one Church Training College for men has been open, namely that at Battersea—there were 3 Winchester Students attending.’ This later entry is entirely consonant with the concentration policy: ‘the Board made it clear that the principle on which the Concentration scheme was operated was that colleges which had closed should retain their corporate identity, and students should remain on the books of their original college.’ (Boyd, referencing Board of Education: Report, 1914-15, p. 74.) Indeed the very policy of colleges retaining their applicants as its own students was important in winning over those colleges that initially resisted closure under the concentration scheme (St. Paul’s Cheltenham was the most reluctant) by giving a sense of ongoing identity, and an anticipation of reopening and post-war existence. Finally, we see that there was certainly no confusion in the student body as to the official identity of Concentration Scheme sojourners. Before its closure, the Durham student periodical The Bede commented on those who had left their courses to fight:

‘To the lads who left us we send our hearty greetings, whether they belong to Bede, Winchester, or Peterborough. The Juniors amongst them have never known any other College, so that some, even though they are not on the roll of Bede Students, look on Durham as their Alma Mater, and hope when the War is over to come back to ‘Good old Bede.’ It is to be feared that this is not very likely, but we shall be pleased if their wish is realized.’ (Vol. XII No.2)

The Library, St. John’s College, Battersea. Copyright Plymouth Marjon University

Eventually we return to Frederick! Following his year as a student teacher in Tisbury, he entered training as a Winchester Training College student at the only remaining men’s teacher training college at Battersea. We have no details of his time there. Winchester records were considerably disrupted by the war and Battersea college archive does not carry a register of students from other colleges, as they were not their charges. However, Battersea’s archive lists eight Winchester students by name in its Teaching Practice Reports (Church, Mackrill, Noise, Price, Selby, Williams, Witts and Woolgar). The severity of disruption caused to students’ training may be seen in this list: Price, Williams and Woolgar were second year students who spent their first year at the now closed Bede College, Durham (Bede College Durham 75th Annual Report, p.10). It would have been surprising to find Frederick listed among the Wintonian diaspora as he was at Battersea for such a brief time: we shall shortly see he donned khaki on or around 10th November 1916. He would therefore not have made it as far as his first teaching practice. However, College Reports mention three Winchester students: two second-years (again, Price and Williams) and one first-year student, un-named as ‘he did not complete his year’. This latter reference fits Frederick’s circumstances precisely. Although he would not have set foot on the Winchester campus. Frederick was a true Wintonian.

Frederick’s War

The Blitz of the Second World War destroyed Frederick’s Army records, so we can only reconstruct his wartime service indirectly. Some of his documents were stored separately and therefore survived. These are: his Medal Roll Index Card, the related Service Medal and Award Roll, a Hospital Admission Register, and the Army Register of Soldiers Effects.

Frederick enlisted in the 14th (Service) Battalion of the Hampshire Regiment in Salisbury and was given the Regimental Number 27745. Although we don’t have a date for this, his number was issued as part of a series. There are extant army records for the soldier carrying the proximal number 27740 and this was issued on 10th November 1916. It is therefore likely that Frederick joined on that day or perhaps the next. His hospital record of late September 1917 tells us that he had been serving in the Army for ten months, which accords well with this extrapolated date. We can therefore see that his time at college was short. He would have been given leave by the college—which encouraged students to enlist—to travel home to bid his family farewell before enlisting.

The Officers, Sergeants and Bands, 14th Service Battalion, Hampshire Regiment. Copyright unknown.

His first experience of army service would have been in Basic Training before being sent to join his 14th Hants Battalion—also known as the 1st Portsmouth Pals—on the Western Front in January 1917. His training was therefore slightly shorter than the usual twelve weeks, a sign of the pressure the army was under at this point of the war.

The Battalion was at Ypres and had been so since early December. Compared to many of the infantry units which moved from battle to battle, in 1917 14th Hants had a settled though not a quiet existence. The Battalion War Diary records day by day the main activities of the men and lists the places they served from January through to September. A lot of the work they did in the trenches was simply logged by terse generic terms such as ‘Working Parties’, ‘Advanced Parties’ and ‘Specialists’, but specific tasks included: setting barbed wire entrapments, repairing duckboards, observation, improving new HQ, filling sandbags, completing dugouts, clearing blown-in trenches, reconnoitring, carrying parties, raiding parties, pushing parties, digging trenches, etc.. Although the words trenches and dugouts are used in this illustrative list, they are misleading when applied to Ypres where the low-lying land had suffered the ravages of artillery bombardment and the landscape, with its high water table and destroyed watercourses, left nothing but waist-deep mud and waterlogged shell holes for the men to crouch in. After listing these mundane tasks, it is important to note that although the Battalion title includes ‘(Service)’, it was a normal fighting unit. The ‘(Service)’ term simply indicates that it was part of the New Army (or Kitchener’s Army)—born out of Kitchener’s insistence on the need to place new volunteers or recruits into new Battalions of men rather than trying to add them in to existing regular or territorial Battalions.

Frederick’s war was fought entirely in the Ypres salient. From January to the end of July the British Army were engaged in holding the line. On 31st July, the great Passchendaele offensive—also known as the Third Battle of Ypres—began, and Frederick would have been caught up in this muddy, bloody maelstrom. On the opening day his Battalion were involved in a full attack in the Hill Top Sector, going over the top at 3.50am. Casualties were, Officers: 3 killed, 2 wounded; Other Ranks: 18 killed, 156 wounded, 42 missing. The enemy trenches were taken, and the following were captured: 2 field guns, 1 4½” howitzer, 17 machine guns, and 200 prisoners.

Places listed in the diary when Frederick’s unit were in the trenches are: Kruisstraat, Observatory Ridge, Zillebeke, Bund, Canal Bank, Hilltop Sector, Wormhout, Wieltje, Houlle, and Hollebeke.

By mid-September 14th Hants were active in the Shrewsbury Forest area of the Ypres front. On the 16th we read a seemingly strange entry:

Fairly quiet day.  Some gas shells over during the night.  Casualties: 30 Other Ranks Killed, 6 Wounded.

The contradiction of the Battalion suffering so many losses on a ‘fairly quiet’ day is a telling comment on perceptions of life at Passchendaele. However, the main point we take from this diary note is the enemy’s use of gas shells. This is not by any means the first mention of the use of gas, but it is significant for Frederick. Although diaries vary in how they report casualties, the 14th Hants listed gas casualties as a separate item, so we note that in this instance there were no men affected by these shells.

The gas used against allied troops at Paschendaele was new to warfare: Mustard Gas—sometimes known as Yellow Cross from the markings on the shells. First used in July, its effects were terrible: exposed skin was blistered, eyes became very painful and vomiting would begin. The gas caused internal and external bleeding and damaged bronchial tubes, stripping away mucous membranes. A painful death could sometimes take four or five weeks. A nurse, Vera Brittain, wrote:

We have heaps of gassed cases at present who came in a day or two ago; there are 10 in this ward alone. I wish those people who write so glibly about this being a holy War, and the orators who talk so much about going on no matter how long the War lasts and what it may mean, could see a case — to say nothing of 10 cases — of mustard gas in its early stages — could see the poor things burnt and blistered all over with great mustard-coloured suppurating blisters, with blind eyes — sometimes temporally [sic], sometimes permanently — all sticky and stuck together, and always fighting for breath, with voices a mere whisper, saying that their throats are closing and they know they will choke. The only thing one can say is that such severe cases don’t last long; either they die soon or else improve — usually the former; they certainly never reach England in the state we have them here…

Brittain, VM (1935). Testament of Youth: An Autobiographical Study of the Years 1900-1925. London: V. Gollancz. p.395
Aerial photograph of Shrewsbury Forest. Date 7 July 1917. IWM image Q 55511. The term ‘Forest’ is misleading. By this point in the conflict this hilltop forest had been completely denuded of trees, with only shattered stumps and trunks remaining.

Casualty rates would increase through the month: from 16th to the 27th the diary reports: 80 Killed, 148 Wounded, 1 Died of Wounds, 30 Missing, 5 Gassed. This makes a total operational loss of 264—greater than one in four of the Battalion.

We will follow the diary verbatim through the last six days of Frederick’s life:

September 22 (Night), Cottage Camp: Battalion moved up to Shrewsbury Forest and relieved 15th Hants and 11th Queen’s in line.  A Company front line, 2 Platoons of B Company in immediate support, C Company main support, and remaining 2 Platoons B Company and D Company in reserve.  Casualties: 3 Wounded Other Ranks.

September 23, Shrewsbury Forest: Heavy shelling by enemy during the early morning, intermediate intermittent shelling during day.  Casualties 2nd Lieutenant AJR Clarke Wounded, 6 Killed 22 Wounded.

September 24, Shrewsbury Forest: Relieved during night of 23rd / 24th by 12 Royal Sussex Regiment in front line and supports and the 11th Sussex in reserve.  Two Companies only in each Battalion.  Casualties 2nd Lieutenant FW Charting Wounded.  Returned to Cottage Camp (Night) except C Company.  The latter remained at Hedge St. Tunnels to form dumps and provide carrying parties.

September 25, Cottage Camps: Battalion moved out of camp up to Shrewsbury Forest sector and took up assembly positions in front of 11th Battalion Royal Sussex Regiment.

September 26, Shrewsbury Forest: Battalion attacked at 5.50 AM.  First objective being Tower Hamlets and second objective Tower Trench.  Heavy casualties through machine gun fire.  Objectives were reached and held and consolidation carried out on our side of Tower Trench.  Casualties: Major Goldsmith Died of Wounds, Killed: Captain T.R. Nichols, Lieutenant Bainbridge, 2nd Lieutenant B.G. Wilson, Wounded: 2nd Lieutenant H.P. Sangster, 2nd Lieutenant R.N. Butt, 2nd Lieutenant Barras, 2nd Lieutenant Thomas.  Other ranks 41 Killed, 113 Wounded, 30 Missing.  Heavy shelling and sniping by enemy all day.

September 27, Shrewsbury Forest: Very quiet morning.  Shelling by enemy during the afternoon which slackened at night.  Casualties: Other Ranks Killed Nil, Wounded, Nil, 5 Gassed.  Relieved by 13th Royal Fusiliers in front line.  13th KRR in Support line.

Above is an October 1917 map of the area described in the War Diary of 26th/27th September. The attack, launched from the high ground of Shrewsbury Forest (left), crossed the valley of Bassevillebeck (the stream is marked in blue and runs from north to south: ‘Steep banks, marshy bottom, 2 feet deep’) to Tower Hamlets (top right, map reference J.21.c.2.5). The extent of British control on October 4th is shown by the blue dashed line. German trenches are in red. The large numbered squares are 1000 yards and contour intervals are 5 metres. The centre of the map is approximately 3½ miles southeast of Ypres. (National Library of Scotland)

Frederick was one of the five men who were gassed on the 27th September. Initially he probably would have received rudimentary care and assessment at the nearest Regimental Aid Post. A brief Army medical record for Frederick survives (National Archives MH106/478): hospital records show that he was placed in a sick convoy before being transferred to 133rd Field Ambulance medical unit the following day, then on to No. 11 Casualty Clearing Station at Godewaersvelde, where he died on the 29th.

Four others of the 14th (Service) Battalion Hants were gassed with him: Pte. Edwin Albert Pitman 242657, Cpl. G.H. Pink 17518, Sgt. F. Videan [text uncertain] 8008, and C.Sgt. R Cooper 4944. Of these, only Private Pitman died, also on the 29th.

Frederick was laid to rest in Godewaersvelde British Cemetery, France, close to the Belgian border. He was survived by his mother, father and three sisters.

He is also remembered on Tisbury Village Memorial and St. John the Baptist Church Memorial Plaque, Tisbury. His name does not appear on the memorial roll of Plymouth Marjon University or the Winchester University/Winchester Training College memorial. Finally, we note that his name is also to be found on the Bishop Wordsworth’s School Memorial. This is a final piece of corroborating evidence of Frederick’s links with the college. The school evidently had a tradition of recommending the college to boys wishing to enter the teaching profession.2 Along with his name are those of three other of our fallen alumni: W. F. Leach, C. F. Singleton and G. N. Wootton.

Bishop Wordsworth School memorial with its four Wintonians
Frederick’s headstone in Godewaersvelde British Cemetery
Researcher and Author: John Vickers

Sources

For all general Winchester training College records please see the list of University of Winchester sources at the end of the following Sources list.

With thanks to Gillian Fewings, Archivist at Plymouth Marjon University (University of St Mark and St John)

Ackland, A.H. Dyke (1911). Report of the Consultative Committee on Examinations in Secondary Schools. London: HM Stationery Office.

Ancestry (2018). Home page. [online] Available at: www.ancestry.co.uk [Accessed 25 June 2018].

Bishop Wordsworth’s School (2018). BWS – 126 Years of history in one webpage. [online] Available at: http://www.bws-school.org.uk/The_School/History/ [Accessed 25 June 2018].

Boyd, Michael V. (1981) The church colleges 1890-1944. Durham: Durham University. [online] Available at: Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7517/

British Newspaper Archive (1902). Warminster & Westbury journal, and Wilts County Advertiser, Saturday 10 May 1902, p.8. [online] Available at: https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.
co.uk/viewer/bl/0001558/19020510/
138/0008 [Accessed 25 June 2018].

British Newspaper Archive (1904). Wiltshire Times and Trowbridge Advertiser, Saturday 20 August 1904, p.5. [online] Available at: https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.
co.uk/viewer/bl/0001557/19040820/
081/0005 [Accessed 25 June 2018].

British Newspaper Archive (1904). Wiltshire Times and Trowbridge Advertiser, Saturday 3 September 1904, p.8. [online] Available at: https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.
co.uk/viewer/bl/0001557/19040903/
136/0008 [Accessed 25 June 2018].

British Newspaper Archive (1917). Wiltshire Times and Trowbridge Advertiser – Saturday 27 October 1917,p.12. [online] Available at: https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.
co.uk/viewer/bl/0001557/19171027/
158/0012  [Accessed 25 June 2018].

British Newspaper Archive (1920). Wiltshire Times and Trowbridge Advertiser – Saturday 16 October 1920, p.7. [online] Available at: https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.
co.uk/viewer/bl/0001557/19201016/
215/0007 [Accessed 29 June 2018].

British Newspaper Archive (1925). Wiltshire Times and Trowbridge Advertiser – Saturday 14 March 1925,p.3. [online] Available at: https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.
co.uk/viewer/bl/0001557/19250314/
064/0003 [Accessed 25 June 2018].

Brittain, VM (1935). Testament of Youth: An Autobiographical Study of the Years 1900-1925. London: V. Gollancz

Elsworth Chronicle (2015). A village policeman, 1912. [online] Available at: http://www.elsworthchronicle.org.uk/
Elsworth%20People/People10.html [Accessed 28 June 2018]

FindMyPast (2018). Bishop Wordsworth’s School Bursary Log. [online] Available at: https://www.findmypast.co.uk/ [Accessed 25 June 2018]

Great War Forum, (2018). Frederick William Randolph, 14th (Service) Battalion, Hampshire Regiment – John Vickers. [online] Available at: https://www.greatwarforum.org/
topic/261791-frederick-william-randolph-
14th-service-battalion-hampshire-
regiment/?tab=comments#comment-2652437 [Accessed 2018].

Hey, D. (1997) The Oxford dictionary of local and family history. Oxford: Oxford university Press.

HMSO (1921) Soldiers Died in the Great War 1914-1919. London: HMSO

Imperial War Museum (2018). Aerial photograph of Shrewsbury Forest, no 7819, Sheet 28.1.30. Date 7 July 1917, Q 55511. [online] Available at: https://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/
item/object/205305167 [Accessed 2018].  

Kelly’s Directory of Wiltshire, 1907, p.241. [online] Available at: http://specialcollections.le.ac.uk/
cdm/ref/collection/p16445coll4/
id/339948 
[Accessed 25 June 2018]. Kelly’s Directory (1915). 

Kelly’s Directory of Wiltshire, 1915, p.245. [online] Available at: http://specialcollections.le.ac.uk/
cdm/ref/collection/p16445coll4/
id/352363 
[Accessed 25 June 2018].

Lidgitt, P. and Naylor, P. Cemetery photographs.

National Library of Scotland (1900) Wiltshire VIII.15 (Lea and Cleverton; Malmesbury St Paul Without; Malmesbury) Revised 1899. [online] Available at: https://maps.nls.uk/view/124880919 [Accessed 25 June 2018] National Library of Scotland (1917) British First World War Trench Maps, 1915-1918, 28.NE Scale: 1:20000   Edition: 8A, Trenches corrected to 1 October 1917. [online] Available at: https://maps.nls.uk/view/101464912 [Accessed 28 June 2018]

Osborne, J. (ed.) (1950) Saltley College Centenary, 1850-1950. Birmingham: Saltley College

Rose, M. (1981). A history of King Alfred’s College, Winchester 1840-1980. London: Phillimore.

Tisbury History Society (2018). Tisbury History Society, The Post Office, Tisbury. [online] Available at: http://www.tisburyhistory.co.uk/
picpages/po.html [Accessed 28 June 2018].


University of Winchester Archive at Hampshire Record Office

All the following documents are general background resources for the WTC Fallen project and provide general period background of students, college life, staff, activities, etc. The Finding Numbers are given to aid archive searches.

47M91W-A1-1 Minute book of the Committee of the Training College, 1909-1927
47M91W/B1/2 Reports of Training College 1913-1914
47M91W/D1/2 The Student Register
47M91W/L1/2 College Rules 1920
47M91W/P2/4 The Wintonian 1899-1900
47M91W/P2/5 The Wintonian 1901-1902
47M91W/P2/6 The Wintonian 1903-1904
47M91W/P2/7 The Wintonian 1904-1906
47M91W/P2/8 The Wintonian 1905-1907
47M91W/P2/10 The Wintonian 1908-1910
47M91W/P2/11 The Wintonian 1910-1914
47M91W/P2/12 The Wintonian 1920-1925
47M91W/Q1/5 Report and Balance Sheets 1904- 1949
47M91W/Q3/6 A Khaki Diary
47M91W/R2/5 History of the Volunteers Company 1910
47M91W/S5/5/10 Photograph of 5 alumni in Mesopotamia
55M81W/PJ1 Managers’ Minute Book 1876-1903
71M88W/6 List of Prisoners at Kut

All material referenced as 47M91W/ is the copyright of The University of Winchester. Permission to reproduce photographs and other material for this narrative has been agreed by the University and Hampshire Record Office.

  1. Winchester had expressed its conviction that the college could survive financially if it were allowed to re-open in 1915. But this must be understood in the context of the summer of 1914 when the duration of the war was unforeseen and the common expectation was that ‘it would be over by Christmas’. Winchester accepted throughout the pragmatism and wisdom of the closures for the duration of the war.
  2. Founded the year after the Winchester college, The Salisbury Diocesan Training College admitted only female students. The college almost found a joint future with Winchester when in 1975 (as Sarum St Michael and King Alfred’s Colleges) and after much work, letters of agreement to merge were signed. This failed at the last hurdle when the Salisbury governors voted against the merger, signing the college‘s death warrant. The D.E.S. then prohibited any further intake of students and the college closed in 1978. Both colleges had a long and parallel history and appear together in Hardy’s 1895 novel Jude the Obscure as Melchester and Wintoncester Training Colleges.